Dismissed¶¶33

Himani Refrigeration And Co. v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC8 Apr 2024CWJC/997/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CWJC 997/2024, decided 08-04-2024 (Harish Kumar, J; Coram: CJ K. Vinod Chandran). Keywords: earnest money return; tender/work-order cancellation; valid character certificate not uploaded with tender; NIT No. 22 of 2023-24 and NIT No. 20 of 2023-24; L1 bidder; VRV/VRF cassette air conditioning, Niyojan Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna; Building Construction Department; BELTRON; Shreyas Enterprises; Upendra Kumar Sinha; Article 226 mandamus; dismissal in terms of CWJC No. 1688 of 2024 (order dt. 28.03.2024); liberty to file representation for refund of earnest money.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief on issuance of the work order; liberty alone reserved to the petitioner to seek return of the earnest money by way of a representation before the concerned authority, which shall pass an appropriate order. ¶¶33

Himani Refrigeration And Co. Vs The State of Bihar — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.997 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Himani Refrigeration and Co. through its proprietor, Assim Kumar, Male, aged about 53 years, Son of Late Jagda Nand Prasad, Resident of 73-K, Harish Chandra Nagar, Sheikhpura, Dhelwan, Police Station - Beur, District - Patna.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Engineer in Chief- cum - Additional Commissioner cum Special Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Chief Electrical Engineer, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Electrical Superintendent Engineer, Electrical Works Circle, South Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The Electrical Executive Engineer, Energy Works Division-I, Patna.

¶12

The Managing Director, Bihar State Electronics Development Corporation Ltd. (Beltron), Patna.

¶13

The 3-Member Circle Tender Committee represented by Electrical Superintendent Engineer, Electrical Works Circle, South Bihar, Patna.

¶14

The Estimator, Electrical Works Circle, South Bihar, Patna.

¶15

The Estimating Officer, Electrical Works Circle, South Bihar, Patna.

¶16

... ... Respondent/s

¶17

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Government Pleader 4 For the BELTRON : Mr. Girish Kumar, Advocate

¶18

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR) Date : 08-04-2024

¶19

Heard the parties.

¶20

The petitioner, a Class-III Contractor, registered with

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.997 of 2024 dt.08-04-2024 2/4

¶22

the Building Construction Department, has invoked the equitable jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs:

¶23

“(i) For issuance of a writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to issue the work order in respect of SITC of VRV/VRF & Cassette Air Conditioning System in Hall, Corridor and 4 No. Rooms at 6^th Floor (Block-B), Niyojan Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna as the Divisional Tender Committee has recommended the lowest rate of bid offered by the petitioner for approval to the Circle Tender Committee and consequently the Circle Tender Committee in its proceeding dated 26.10.2023 has approved the recommendation of the Divisional Tender Committee for allotment of work to the petitioner firm by issuing necessary directions but the respondent no. 6 for reason best known to him is not issuing the work order which action of respondent no. 6 is arbitrary, illegal and malafide.

¶24

(ii) For issuance of status quo or in the alternative, restraining respondent no. 6 from taking any coercive step during the pendency of the writ petition.

¶25

(iii) For any other relief / reliefs to which the petitioner is found entitled in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶26

It is submitted that in response to NIT No. 22 of 2023-24 dated 21.09.2023 the petitioner submitted his tender and after having found the petitioner L1 bidder, the Divisional

¶27

Patna High Court CWJC No.997 of 2024 dt.08-04-2024 3/4

¶28

Tender Committee recommended the name of the petitioner's firm for the award of contract to the Circle Tender Committee and pursuant thereto, the recommendation has also been made to issue work order in favour of the petitioner’s firm. However, on account of objection raised by the tenderers, namely, Shreyas Enterprises and Upendra Kumar Sinha in relation to nonfiling/uploading of valid character certificate; led to cancellation of the work order.

¶29

Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, learned Counsel representing the petitioner fairly submitted that in an identical matter in relation to another work order under the same NIT No. 20 of 2023-24 in CWJC No. 1688 of 2024, this Court vide its order dated 28.03.2024 has negated the submission of the petitioner after holding that the petitioner has failed to upload the valid character certificate with tender document and any character certificate even if produced subsequently would be inconsequential, since in the tendering the last date is sacrosanct due to competition between various tenderers.

¶30

However, adverting to the aforesaid facts, he further contended that now the grievance of the petitioner is only with respect to withholding of earnest money by the concerned Department without there being any adverse order against him

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.997 of 2024 dt.08-04-2024 4/4

¶32

in this regard. At this juncture, it was also submitted that even before the decision of the competent authority, adverse to the petitioner, valid character certificate has already been issued in favour of the petitioner.

¶33

Considering the identical issue and the submissions advanced before this Court, the present writ petition also stands dismissed in terms of the order dated 28.03.2024 passed in CWJC No. 1688 of 2024, however reserving liberty to the petitioner to raise his grievance for return of the earnest money by filing a proper representation before the concerned authority, who shall look into the matter and pass an appropriate order.

¶34

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

¶35

( Harish Kumar, J)

¶36

Anjani/-

¶37

AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date	10.04.2024
Transmission Date

Himani Refrigeration And Co. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Himani Refrigeration And Co. v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amvika Prasad Vs Bihar State Religious Trust Board

Abhay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gramin Vikash Sangharsh Samiti Vs The State of Bihar

Visro Infra Project Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited

Shashi Ranjan Kumar Vs Union of India

M/s Maa Rajeshwari Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State of Bihar