Indra Bhushan Sinha @ Indu Bhushan Sinha Vs The State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9866 of 2020

======================================================

Indra Bhushan Sinha @ Indu Bhushan Sinha W/o Late Tareshwar Prasad resident of Mohalla- House No.- 100 Shivpuri, Beur Road, Anisabad, Patna, P.S.- Gardanibagh, P.O.- Anisabad, District- Patna, Bihar- 800002.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, through its Managing Director, Patna.

¶8

The District Manager, Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, Patna.

¶9

The General Manager, Administration, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation Limited, Patna, Bihar.

¶10

The Chief of Finance, Bihar State Food and Civil Supply Corporation, Patna, Bihar.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashank Shekhar Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Vishwambhar Prasad, AC to AAG-5 For the BSFC : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv. ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶14

11 19-01-2024

¶15

Heard Mr. Shashank Shekhar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Vishwambhar Prasad, learned counsel for the State and Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the BSFC.

¶16

The writ petition has substantially been filed for a direction upon the respondent-authorities to ensure payment of entire gratuity and leave encashment to the petitioner with penal interest till the date of payment and also to ensure payment of arrears of due salary for certain period.

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.9866 of 2020(11) dt.19-01-2024 2/2

¶18

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondent/BSFC, with a categorical assertion that the petitioner has already been sanctioned his retirement benefit(s) vide Memo No. 1322 dated 20.08.2020 and, subsequently, an amount of Rs. 10,82,115/- has been credited in the account of the petitioner. It is further submitted that so far the grievance of the petitioner with regard to the enhanced gratuity is concerned, the same is not admissible to the petitioner, as the Board of Director has taken a conscious decision to extend the gratuity only to the tune of Rs. 3.50 lacs at maximum.

¶19

At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the sole petitioner has already died on 14.12.2022, as per his instruction and despite the information given to the legal heirs of the sole petitioner, none has turned up.

¶20

In view of the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶21

Needless to observe that in case, the legal heirs of the sole petitioner (since died) has any grievance, he/she shall be at liberty to ventilate it in accordance with law.

¶22

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶23

rohit/-

¶24

U

Indra Bhushan Sinha @ Indu Bhushan Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indra Bhushan Sinha @ Indu Bhushan Sinha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunny Kumar Singh @ Sunny Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Heera Lal Bharti @ Hiralal Bharti @ Hira Lal Bharti Vs The State of Bihar

Braj Kishor Vs The State of Bihar

Rambriksh Paswan and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Champa Devi Vs The Union of India