Disposed

Arjun Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Nov 2024CWJC/944/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenged encroachment notices under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act for want of hearing and final order. Petitioners sought liberty to approach the District Magistrate, Patna; liberty granted and the petition was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioners to approach the District Magistrate, Patna for redressal of their grievances; writ petition disposed of.

Arjun Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Land Acquisition | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.944 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Arjun Yadav son of Prayag Yadav, Resident of Village-Garuari, P.S.Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna

¶4

Surendra Prasad son of Prayag Yadav, Resident of Village-Garuari, P.S.Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna

¶5

Naresh yadav, son of Prayag Yadav, Resident of Village-Garuari, P.S.Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna

¶6

... ... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Land Reforms, Bihar, Patna

¶9

The Distinct Magistrate, Patna, District- Patna 3. The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Barh, District- Patna 4. The Deputy Collector Land reforms, Barh, District- Patna

¶10

The Circle Officer Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sajid Salim Khan (SC-25) ======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 13-11-2024

¶15

The present writ petition has been filed

¶16

seeking the following reliefs:-

¶17

“1. a. For quashing the notice dated 24/08/2018, issued in the name of the petitioners, under section 2 of sub section (5) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act and also for quashing the notice dated 19/11/2019, issued in connection with Encroachment Case No 05/2017-18 by the Circle Officer, Bakhtiyarpur

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.944 of 2020(4) dt.13-11-2024

¶19

2/2

¶20

directing the petitioners to remove the encroachment from the land in question, without rejecting the objection of the petitioners as also without passing any final order.

¶21

b. For further direction upon the concerned respondents to pass the final order, after giving opportunity of hearing and considering the objections of the petitioners.

¶22

c. For further directing the Respondent authority not to take any coercive steps till passing of the final order in Encroachment Case No. 5/2017-2018.”

¶23

At the outset, the learned counsel for

¶24

the petitioners seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the District Magistrate, Patna for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

¶25

The writ petition stands disposed off.

¶26

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶27

S.Sb/-

¶28

Arjun Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arjun Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Prasad Gupta @ Rajendra Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhat Kumar Srivastava Vs The State of Bihar

Ganga Mandal and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Broad Son Commodities Private Limited, Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Murari @ Krishna Murari Yadav Vs The State of Bihar