Disposed

Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Nov 2024CWJC/6121/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging encroachment on land. The respondent-State's counsel submitted that encroachment proceedings were dropped as the land is Gairmajarua Malik with Jamabandi in the private respondent's favor. Liberty to approach the District Magistrate was granted.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach the District Magistrate, Sheikhpura for redressal of grievance.

Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6121 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Pankaj Kumar Son of Ram Jatan Prasad Singh, Resident of VillageKhojagachhi, Police Station- Barbigha, District- Sheikhpura.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura.

¶8

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura.

¶9

The Sub Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura.

¶10

The Deputy Development Commissioner Sheikhpura, District- Sheikhpura.

¶11

The Circle Officer, Barbigha, District- Sheikhpura.

¶12

The S.H.O., Barbigha, District- Sheikhpura.

¶13

Ranjay Kumar@ Ranjay Kumar Singh, Son of Ram Khelawan Singh, Resident of Village- Khojagachhi Police Station-Barbigha, DistrictSheikhpura.

¶14

... ... Respondent/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dileep Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rishi Raj Sinha (SC-19) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶16

3 13-11-2024 Though the present writ petition has been filed for removal of encroachment made by the private respondents over the land appertaining to Khata No. 92, Plot No. 1020, P.S. No. 31, situated at Mauja-Masumpur, Khojagachhi, however, at the outset, the learned counsel for the respondent-State, upon instruction, submits that the Circle Officer, Barbigha, DistrictSheikhpura has dropped the encroachment proceedings since the said land has been found to be Gairmajarua Malik as also

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.6121 of 2020(3) dt.13-11-2024 2/2

¶18

Jamabandi is running in favour of the private respondent.

¶19

In view of the aforesaid, the learned counsel for the

¶20

petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the District Magistrate, Sheikhpura for redressal of his grievance. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

¶21

The writ petition stands disposed off.

¶22

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶23

S.Sb/-

¶24

Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Prasad Gupta @ Rajendra Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhat Kumar Srivastava Vs The State of Bihar

Ganga Mandal and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Arjun Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Broad Son Commodities Private Limited, Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Murari @ Krishna Murari Yadav Vs The State of Bihar