Disposed

Bhushan Bihari v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jan 2024CWJC/779/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court in writ jurisdiction directed the District Magistrate to verify if the petitioner's special meeting adhered to notice provisions under the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006. The court stayed the meeting on 20.01.2024 and ordered records collection for a hearing on the no-confidence motion charges.

What did the court decide?

District Magistrate to verify meeting notice compliance, call for records, fix attendance date, and decide the matter considering charges heard in presence of parties.

Bhushan Bihari Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.779 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Bhushan Bihari wife of Bhai Bhushan Bihari, R/o village- Nandwara, Ward No.5, P.O.- Bel, P.S.- Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi, at present Pramukh Bairgania, District-Sitamarhi.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

1. The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

1. The Principal Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna

¶8

1. The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

¶9

The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Sitamarhi. 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Sitamarhi

¶10

The Block Development Officer-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Prakhand Panchayat Samiti, Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi

¶11

Ram Lal Paswan father's name not known, Panchayati Samiti Member, Bairgania, Sitamarhi

¶12

Bibha Devi husband's name not known, Panchayati Samiti Member, Bairgania, Sitamarhi.

¶13

Bharti Devi husband's name not known, Panchayati Samiti Member, Bairgania, Sitamarhi

¶14

Sukeshwari Devi husband's name not known, Panchayati Samiti Member, Bairgania, Sitamarhi

¶15

Mehnaz Khanam husband's name not known, Panchayati Samiti Member, Bairgania, Sitamarhi

¶16

Tajmun Nesha husband's name not known, Panchayati Samiti Member, Bairgania, Sitamarhi

¶17

Shweta Devi husband's name not known, Panchayati Samiti Member, Bairgania, Sitamarhi.

¶18

Rani Devi husband's name not known, Panchayati Samiti Member, Bairgania, Sitamarhi.

¶19

Md. Aslam father's name not known, Panchayati Samiti Member, Bairgania, Sitamarhi.

¶20

Md. Kasim father's name not known, Panchayati Samiti Member, Bairgania, Sitamarhi.

¶21

... ... Respondent/s

¶22

=============== Appearance :	====	===================================
For the Petitioner/s	:	Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate
For the State	:	Mr. Standing Counsel 11
For respondent no.10	:	Mr. S. B. K. Manglam, Advocate Mr. Awnish Kumar, Advocate

¶23

Patna High Court CWJC No.779 of 2024(2) dt.16-01-2024 2/3

¶24

======================================================

¶25

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶26

2 16-01-2024

¶27

Heard Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, learned counsel

¶28

appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. S. B. K. Manglam along side Mr. Awnish Kumar, learned counsels for the respondent no.10 and learned SC 11 for the State.

¶29

The petitioner is the Pramukh and he had already chosen to fix the date of the meeting on 11.01.2024. The Block Development Officer -cum- Executive Officer had found it to be not in accordance with the provision of Sections 44 and 46(4) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) because seven days clear period of notice was not given and directed the Up-pramukh to fix the date of special meeting on 20.01.2024.

¶30

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks to avail remedy under Section 157 of Bihar Panchyat Raj Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for the relief, as prayed for in the present writ petition.

¶31

The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi must verify whether the petitioner had fixed the special meeting on 11.01.2024 is in conformity with the provision of Section 46(4) of the Act. The action of Block Development Officer and UpPramukh is also required to be inquired into, who has fixed the

¶32

Patna High Court CWJC No.779 of 2024(2) dt.16-01-2024 3/3

¶33

date of special meeting on 20.01.2024. The District Magistrate is further directed to call for the records relating to Panchayat Samiti of concerned Block and fix a date within two days after communication of this order for the attendance of Pramukh, UpPramukh and all the members of the Panchayat Samiti and seek their signature in his own presence and thereafter he may fix a date for providing opportunity of hearing to the affected parties and decide the matter considering the charges as contained in the requisition. If he finds that there is violation of manner as prescribed under Section 44 or Section 46 of the Act and same requires interference in any manner with respect to calling of “No Confidence Motion”, he may pass a speaking order strictly in accordance with law.

¶34

The special meeting dated 20.01.2024 shall lose its operation till final decision is taken by the District Magistrate.

¶35

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of.

¶36

(Purnendu Singh, J)

¶37

Sanjay/-

¶38

Bhushan Bihari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhushan Bihari v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandrjyoti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Puja Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Shamima Begam @ Shamina Begam Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Geeta Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Mandal Vs The State of Bihar