Disposed

Yugesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 Apr 2024CWJC/7681/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged rejection of his candidature for the post of Sub-Inspector of Police after selection. The court noted he had not challenged a subsequent DIG order rejecting his representation and disposed of the writ petition with liberty to challenge that order before the appropriate forum.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to petitioner to challenge the DIG order (Annexure-E) before the appropriate forum; no substantive relief granted.

Yugesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7681 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Yugesh Kumar S/o-Jawahar Prasad, R/o Village-Raikad, P.S.-Varisaliganj, District-Nawada.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State Of Bihar

¶7

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Avinash, Adv. : Mr. Arvind Kr. Pradhan For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md.Nadeem Seraj -GP5 : Mrs. Shalini, AC to GP5 For the SSC : Mr. S.S. Sundaram, Adv. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 08-04-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

counsel for the State and counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna.

¶15

The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the order contained in memo No.2664 dated 18.09.2017 issued by respondent No.3 by which petitioner’s candidature was rejected for the post of Sub-Inspector of Police even after selection.

¶16

Counsel for the BSSC raised preliminary objection and submits that the petitioner has filed a fresh representation before the DIG, Headquarter, Bihar Patna, who passed in Memo No.707/390239 dated 24.09.2018 with regard to the petitioner

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.7681 of 2018(3) dt.08-04-2024 2/2

¶18

vide Annexure-E of the counter-affidavit which the petitioner has not challenged till date.

¶19

Accordingly, the present writ application is hereby disposed off, granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge Annexure-E of the counter-affidavit before the appropriate forum raising all the points which he has raised in the present writ petition.

¶20

With the aforesaid direction, the present writ application stands disposed off.

¶21

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶22

Prakashmani/-

¶23

Yugesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yugesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Yadav, Vs The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.

Kiran Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mostt. Aanandi Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Kamal Anwar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.