Dismissed

Sunil Kumar Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC8 Apr 2024CWJC/7677/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged BSSC's refusal to consider their Non Creamy Layer Certificate in an O.T. Assistant selection, having failed to produce it at counselling despite clear instructions that reservation claims would be treated as unreserved without it. The court found no ground for interference and dismissed the writ petition; a stay application was dismissed as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

Sunil Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7677 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sunil Kumar Singh and Anr Son of Sri Bahadur Singh, Resident of VillageKamalpur, Post-Hansa, P.S.-Raniganj, District Araria.

¶4

Ganesh Kumar, Son of Sri Jagnath Sah, Resident of Village P.O.-Sarmastpur, Police Station-Sakara, District-Muzaffarpur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar and Ors 2. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna-800014.

¶8

The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection, Commission, Veterinary College, Patna-14.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Chandra Bhushan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binod Kr.Yadav -Sc18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 08-04-2024

¶12

Counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the BSSC and Counsel for the State present.

¶13

I.A. No. 01 of 2009

¶14

The present I.A. has been filed demanding the Stay

¶15

of the operation of Annexure-A. Counsel for the petitioner himself submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the prayer made in the interlocutory application has become infructuous, therefore, he is not pressing the said I.A. i.e. I.A. No. 01 of 2009.

¶16

In view of the above, the said I.A. i.e. I.A. No. 01 of 2009 stands dismissed.

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.7677 of 2018(3) dt.08-04-2024 2/3

¶18

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents to call for the interview to the successful candidates for the selection process which is going on for post of 'O.T. Assistant'.

¶19

Counsel submits that petitioner has participated in the exam held by B.S.S.C. Counsel submits that petitioners have submitted their Non Creamy Layer Certificate of the year 2014 which has not been considered by the Commission due to which petitioners became aggrieved.

¶20

Counsel for the Commission on the other hand submits that Counter affidavit has been filed and in the counter affidavit it has been categorically stated that they have appeared in the examination process and Non Creamy Layer Certificate at the time of counseling which was necessarily to be submitted has not been submitted. He further submits that in the interview letter, it has been categorically mentioned that at the time of counseling, the Non Creamy Layer Certificate has to be produced, otherwise, the person claiming reservation shall be treated in Unreserved Category. Counsel submits that from the applications filed by the petitioners, it transpires that they have appeared in the counseling process without Creamy Layer Certificate which is apparent from the application form as well

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.7677 of 2018(3) dt.08-04-2024 3/3

¶22

as their representation.

¶23

In the light of the submissions made, it transpires to

¶24

this Court that in the counseling letter, it has been specifically quoted that candidate must come with the Creamy Layer Certificate but petitioner failed to appear with the said certificate. As such, there is no interference required in the said order.

¶25

Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed.

¶26

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶27

Sunnykr/-

¶28

Sunil Kumar Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sunil Kumar Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar Yadav, Vs The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.

Kiran Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Mostt. Aanandi Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Kamal Anwar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Renu Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.