Disposed

M/S Attalica Enterprise, v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Apr 2024CWJC/6261/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged a show-cause notice concerning blacklisting in a works contract matter. The court directed the petitioner to raise its contention before the appropriate authority within two weeks and left it to that authority to issue a fresh notice if needed, disposing of the petition without merits observations.

What did the court decide?

Direction to petitioner to appear before appropriate authority within two weeks; authority to act as suggested.

M/S Attalica Enterprise, Vs The State of Bihar — Public Procurement and Tenders | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6261 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

M/S Attalica Enterprise, Through Its Properitor Kartik Das(Male) aged about 52 years, S/O Makhan Lal Das, R/O Netaji Pally, Islampur, PO and PS.Islampur, Pin Code- 733202, District - Dinajpur, State- West Bengal.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar Through Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishwaishwraia Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

¶7

The Additional Chief Executive Officer-Cum- Secretary, Bihar Rural Road Development Agency (BRRADA), Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishwaishwraiya Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

¶8

The Engineer-inChief-Cum-Additional Commissioner-Cum-Special Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishwaishwraiya Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

¶9

The Chief Engineer- 2, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Vishwaishwraiya Bhawan, Baily Road, Patna.

¶10

Sri Arvind Kumar The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Work Circle- Kishanganj, District - Kishanganj, Govt. of Bihar.

¶11

The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division - Kishanganj-1, District- West Champaran, Govt. of Bihar.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Binita Singh, Standing Counsel (28) ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶15

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶16

3 20-04-2024 The petitioner is concerned with a show-cause notice

¶17

issued at Annexure-P/7 dated 23.02.2024. The specific contention taken by the petitioner is that the show-cause notice issued is in violation of the stipulations for blacklisting in works contract matters, as laid down by a learned Single Judge

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.6261 of 2024(3) dt.20-04-2024 2/2

¶19

of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 12736 of 2021. The petitioner would be entitled to take such contention before the appropriate authority. If the appropriate authority feels that the stipulations in the judgment have not been complied with, the appropriate authority would also be entitled to issue a fresh show-cause notice. The petitioner would appear before the appropriate authority within two weeks from today and the appropriate authority shall take either of the courses suggested by us.

¶20

The writ petition stands disposed of without any observation on the merits.

¶21

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)

¶22

( Harish Kumar, J)

¶23

aditya/-

¶24

M/S Attalica Enterprise, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Attalica Enterprise, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shrikant Prasad @ Jashwant Singh @ Yaswant Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Jha Vs The Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

Nagendra Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Athar Hussain Vs The State of Bihar

Naiyer Mughni Vs The State of Bihar