Manoj Kumar Jha Vs The Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.492 of 2024

======================================================

Manoj Kumar Jha son of Harsh Mohan Jha, Resident of village Balua Bazar, ward no. 06, P.S. Balua Bazar, District Supaul, Bihar.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (A Government Of India Undertaking) Siksha Bhawan, Bihar Rashtrabhasha Parishad Campus, Acharya Shivpujan Sahay Path, Saidpur, Patna through its Managing Director.

¶7

The Managing Director, Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (A Government Of India Undertaking) Siksha Bhawan, Bihar Rashtrabhasha Parishad Campus, Acharya Shivpujan Sahay Path, Saidpur, Patna.

¶8

The Chief Engineer, Bihar State Educational Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (A Government Of India Undertaking) Siksha Bhawan, Bihar Rashtrabhasha Parishad Campus, Acharya Shivpujan Sahay Path, Saidpur, Patna.

¶9

... ... Respondent/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Girijish Kumar, Advocate

¶11

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

¶13

6 19-04-2024 The learned counsel for the petitioner sought for withdrawal of the writ petition. The learned counsel for the respondent objected specifically pointing out that there is a deliberate falsehood made in the writ petition.

¶14

The learned counsel for the petitioner informs us that as per the instruction of the client, it was averred in paragraph no. 12 that though a show-cause notice dated 05.12.2022 was issued, it was not served upon the petitioner before the order of blacklisting.

¶15

Patna High Court CWJC No.492 of 2024(6) dt.19-04-2024 2/2

¶16

In the counter affidavit Annexure-R/3E is produced which is the e-mail sent to the e-mail ID of the petitioner herein. The learned counsel submits that he was not informed of the same.

¶17

However, considering the fact that the petitioner has made a deliberate falsehood we impose a cost of Rs. 5,000/- on the petitioner payable to the Bihar State Legal Services Authority. The said amount will have to be paid within a period of two weeks and if not, the Bihar State Legal Services Authority shall be entitled to proceed for recovery by taking measures similar to recovery of arrears due on land through the District Magistrate, in which event the petitioner shall be liable for the charges incurred for making such recovery, which have to be recovered by the State.

¶18