Suraj Lal Prasad v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ application as infructuous because the respondent recalled the impugned letter vide an office order dated 14.08.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5301 of 2021
======================================================
SURAJ LAL PRASAD Son of Late Dip Lal Sah Resident of village and Post Office- Tarwara, P.s.- G.B. Nagar, (Tarwara), District-Siwan
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the State : Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadaw, GP-23 For the BEPC : Mr.Girijish Kumar, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CWJC No.5301 of 2021(7) dt.29-08-2024 2/2
become infructuous.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
pallavi/-
U
Suraj Lal Prasad
The State of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar
The Director, Primary Education, Bihar
The District Magistrate, Siwan
The District Education Officer, Siwan
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court