This order rejects the petitioner's prayer for anticipatory bail in a theft case under Section 379 IPC, citing recovery of the alleged stolen vehicle from his house as a sufficient ground to deny bail.
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53413 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2022 Thana- GOPALPUR District- West Champaran
======================================================
Chand Mian Son of Pirmohammad Hawari R/V- VILLAGE- P.O.RAGHUNATHPUR, P.S.- RAMGADHWA, DISTT.- EAST CHAMPARAN
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manaur Alam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
2 28-08-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53413 of 2024(2) dt.28-08-2024 2/2
specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
anand/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a theft case where prosecution material was recovered from his house.
Chand Mian Son of Pirmohammad Hawari
The State of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
