Petitioner sought regularization of daily-wage service under Resolution No. 639 dated 16.03.2006, claiming his name was wrongly placed at the bottom of the final seniority list. Court directed the District Magistrate, Madhubani to reconsider afresh per Pandav Yadav and the Litigation Policy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4804 of 2018
======================================================
Bishnukant Thakur son of late Sukhdeo Thakur Resident of Village Kampur, P.O. Mahrail, P.S. Rudrapur, Via Jhanjharpur, District Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amarendra Narayan, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr.Harish Kumar -Gp8 Mr. Sudhanshu Adv ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
for the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4804 of 2018(4) dt.09-01-2024 2/4
of candidates were prepared without considering the seniority of daily wages employee.
Patna High Court CWJC No.4804 of 2018(4) dt.09-01-2024 3/4
same.
“A good number of cases are from the category of similar cases. Each Government Department will aim to consider and settle the claim of the representationist/applicant employee/ citizens, if the claim is found covered by any decision of the Court. Many service matters of this nature, can be disposed of at the level of the Department itself without compelling the litigant to come to the Court. In this manner. The government Departments would be acting as efficient litigants.”
Patna High Court CWJC No.4804 of 2018(4) dt.09-01-2024 4/4
speaking order considering the said judgment as well as the said law 4.C(1) of Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Sunnykr/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's case for regularization should be reconsidered afresh in light of the Pandav Yadav judgment and Clause 4.C(1) of the Bihar State Litigation Policy, 2011?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Pandav Yadav Vs. State of Bihar and Ors.Applied
Pandav Yadav Vs. State of Bihar and Ors., C.W.J.C. No. 692 of 2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bishnukant Thakur
The State Of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department
The Joint Secretary, Water Resources Department
The Commissioner, Darbhanga
The Collector, Darbhanga
Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
