A writ petition concerning an Anganbari Centre sevika selection matter was withdrawn by the petitioner because the appellate authority had not passed a final order; permission was granted to pursue the appeal, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission granted to pursue the matter before the appellate authority; writ petition withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19666 of 2018
======================================================
Saroj Devi Wife of Sri Ram Ashish Paswan, Resident of Village+ Post OfficePadariya, Police Station- Chutiya, District- Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Mandal, SC-3 Mr. Arjun Prasad, AC to SC-3 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
2 08-01-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
for the State are present.
Patna High Court CWJC No.19666 of 2018(2) dt.08-01-2024 2/2
the final order has not been passed by the appellate authority. As such, he seeks permission to pursue the matter before the appellate authority.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Mkr./-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner could withdraw the writ petition to pursue the matter before the appellate authority pending its final order.
Saroji Devi
The State of Bihar
Ranju Devi
Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
