Petitioner claimed grievance redressed per counter-affidavit paragraphs 8 and 9. Court considered this fact and disposed of the writ application without further argument or substantive decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4513 of 2019
======================================================
Vinod Kumar Sharma Son of Late Gore Lal Sharma, Resident of VillageAlma, P.O.- Khamhanti, P.S.- Simri Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa, At present Assistant Teacher, Upgraded Middle School, Ranginiya Simri, Bakhtiyarpur, District- Saharsa. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Mukund, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Namrata Singh, AC to Ex G.A.-12
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 19-02-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned counsel for the State.
view of the statements made in paragraphs no. 8 and 9 of the counter affidavit, the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed.
disposed of.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
anand/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| Uploading Date | 22.02.2024 |
| Transmission Date | NA |
Vinod Kumar Sharma
The State of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
