Disposed

Sumit Kumar Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Feb 2024CWJC/2292/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Registered owner sought release of his motorcycle seized under excise provisions after theft. State admitted no confiscation proceedings had concluded. Court directed authorities to release the vehicle to the petitioner upon identification against ownership documents, permitting a bank guarantee for its value.

What did the court decide?

Release of the seized motorcycle to petitioner on identification of documents, subject to possible bank guarantee; further proceedings within six months.

Sumit Kumar Gupta Vs The State of Bihar — Property and Title | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2292 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sumit Kumar Gupta Son of Gorakh Prasad Gupta, resident of Village - Singaha, Tola Kawalhata, P.O. Hathua, P.S. - Mirganj, District - Gopalganj.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Superintendent of Excise, Saran (Chapra).

¶8

The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Saran (Chapra).

¶9

The Station House Officer, Jalalpur P.S., District - Saran.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramadhar Shekhar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Additional Advocate General 13

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

¶16

Date : 17-02-2024

¶17

In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the

¶18

following reliefs:-

¶19

"a) To direct the respondents, particularly the S.H.O., Jalalpur (Saran) to release in favour of the petitioner, being the rightful registered owner of the Apache Motorcycle black colour bearing Chasis no. MD634AE96L2L02022, Engine No. AE9LL2902060, which was seized in connection with Jalalpur P.S. Case No. 287/23 dated 02.11.2023 registered under section 413, 414, 34 of I.P.C and 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016,

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.2292 of 2024 dt.17-02-2024 2/3

¶21

which had been theft by the unknown theft on n 29.07.2022 for which Siwan Muffasil P.S. Case No. 433/22 i/s 379 of I.P.C. was lodged by the petitioner, mentioning the stolen Apache Black Colour motorcycle bearing Reg. No. BR-29-AN-5849 having the same chassis and engine number of the seized motorcycle."

¶22

Learned counsel for the respondent-State on instruction submitted that official respondents have filed counter affidavit and it is admitted fact that confiscation proceedings have not been initiated and concluded.

¶23

In the light of these facts and circumstances and the fact that petitioner has already registered FIR for theft of the subject matter of the motor vehicle. The concerned authority is directed to release the subject matter of the motor vehicle in favour of the petitioner and proceed to complete all further proceedings within a period of six months from the date of receipt of this order. While releasing the subject matter of the motor vehicle in favour of the petitioner, the concerned authority is hereby directed to take note of identification of the motor vehicle with reference to documents read with the registered owner. Officials-Respondents may insist for bank guarantee with reference to value of the motor vehicle. The above exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

¶24

Patna High Court CWJC No.2292 of 2024 dt.17-02-2024 3/3

¶25

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition

¶26

stands disposed of.

¶27

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

¶28

( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶29

asmit/-

¶30

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	N/A
Uploading Date	21.02.2024
Transmission Date	N/A

Sumit Kumar Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sumit Kumar Gupta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mantu Kumar Vs Bihar Rajya dwara Zila Padadhikari

Ram Kisun Sah, Vs Manoj Kumar Rai

Uma Shankar Singh Vs The State of Bihar.

Girijesh Kumar Vs The Government of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises

Fakary Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shamsher @ Mintu @ Mir Shamasher Alam Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home Affairs