Petitioners sought permission to withdraw their writ petition; the High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17133 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Navin Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.K. Shahi, AG For the L.N.M.U. : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, Advocate Mr. Ali M. Ahmad, Advocate For the M.U. : Mr. Siddhartha Prasad, Advocate For the B.N.M.U. : Mr. Ritesh Kumar, Advocate For Respondent No.7 : Mr. Rajesh Pd. Chaudhary, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate ======================================================
Patna High Court CWJC No.17133 of 2017(7) dt.08-01-2024 2/2
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
7 08-01-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission
to withdraw the writ petition.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Rajiv Roy, J)
Anushka/-
U
Dr. Ashutosh Kumar Sinha and Ors
The State Of Bihar
The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar
The Chancellor, Universities of Bihar
The Magadh University through its Registrar
The Jay Prakash University through its Registrar
K. Vinod Chandran
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
