The Patna High Court, by an oral order, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners who sought permission to withdraw the same.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16994 of 2017
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Navin Prasad Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr.P.K. Shahi, AG For the P.U. : Mr.Md. Nadim Seraj, Advocate For the U.G.C. : Mr. Amrendra Nath Verma, Advocate For the Chancellor : Mr. Rajendra Kumar Giri, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
7 08-01-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission
Patna High Court CWJC No.16994 of 2017(7) dt.08-01-2024 2/2
to withdraw the writ petition.
(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ)
( Rajiv Roy, J)
Anushka/-
U
Dr. Ashutosh Kumar Sinha and others
The State Of Bihar
Honourable The Chief Justice
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
