Petitioners grievances stood redressed during the pendency of the writ petition; counsel sought disposal and the court accordingly disposed of the petition without adjudicating any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1703 of 2024
======================================================
Sonu Kumar Son of Late Arun Kumar Mishra Resident of Village-Kachor, Kamla Garden Road Baswariya P.S. Mehsaul District- Sitamarhi
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Subodh Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr.Addl. Advocate General (5) Mr.Alok Ranjan, AC to AAG-5 For the Resp No.10 : Mr.K.K. Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
submits that the grievances of the petitioner has stood redressed during the interregnum period, hence the present writ petition be disposed off.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
sonal/- U
Sonu Kumar
The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Disaster Management, Bihar, Patna.
The District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.
The Director, Disaster Management Department, Bihar, Patna.
The Regional Deputy Director, Health, Bihar, Patna.
The Civil Surgeon-Cum-Chief Medical Officer, Sitamarhi.
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
