Satrohan Sharma and Anr. v. Dharm Nath Mahto and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging a civil court's order rejecting an objection to a Pleader Commissioner's report. Citing Radhey Shyam v. Chhabi Nath that judicial orders of civil courts are not amenable to Article 226 writ jurisdiction, the court granted four weeks to convert the petition into a Civil Miscellaneous petition under Article 227.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16912 of 2014
======================================================
- Satrohan Sharma son of Late Gaya Sharma
- Vinay Kumar Sharma son of Late Lakshuman Sharma, Both are resident of village- Kopa, PO and P.S.- Kopa Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
- Dharm Nath Mahto son of Mahavir Mahto, resident of village- Kopa, PO and PS- Kopa Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra
- Chinta Devi, wife of Late Lakshuman Sharma 3. Manmohan Sharma, son of Late Lakshuman Sharma, 4. Fulkumari, daughter of Late Awadhesh Sharma
- Shiri Sharma, son of Late Vishnu Sharma All resident of village- Kopa, PO and PS- Kopa Bazar, District- Saran at Chapra
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Jitendra Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. ======================================================
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition under Article 226 is maintainable against an interlocutory order of a civil court, in view of Radhey Shyam v. Chhabi Nath?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Satrohan Sharma
- petitioner
Vinay Kumar Sharma
- respondent
Dharm Nath Mahto
- respondent
Chinta Devi
- respondent
Manmohan Sharma
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court