Navin Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition, which was granted. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15935 of 2022
======================================================
Navin Kumar Yadav Son of Sushil Kumar Yadav Proprietor of M/s Navin Fertilizer Manjholi, Dagrua, resident of Champa Baraill, Ward no.- 6, Police Station- Dagarua, District- Purnea.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arun Kumar Mandal For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sarvesh Kumar Singh ( Aag 13 ) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER
seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
as withdrawn.
(A. Abhishek Reddy, J)
Ayush/-
U
Navin Kumar Yadav
The State of Bihar through the Secretary of Agriculture Department
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court