Disposed

Surendra Giri v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Dec 2024CWJC/14926/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition sought a direction to the Divisional Commissioner to dispose of the petitioner's pending PDS revision within the time limit prescribed by the Bihar Targeted PDS Control Order, 2016. The court directed disposal within eight weeks, with notice and hearing to the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, to dispose of the petitioner's revision preferably within eight weeks, after notice and hearing.

Surendra Giri Vs The State of Bihar — Writ and Judicial Review | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14926 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Surendra Giri, aged about 47 years, Gender-Male, S/o Ramashra Giri, Resident of Village-Gochhi, P.O.-Keshariya, P.S.-Keshariya, District-East Champaran.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

¶8

The Collector, East Champaran, Motihari.

¶9

The Sub Divisional Officer, Chakiya, East Champaran.

¶10

The Additional District Supply Officer, Chakiya, East Champaran.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Arvind Ujjwal (SC 4)

¶14

======================================================

¶15

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 11-12-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶17

The present Writ Petition has been filed for the

¶18

following reliefs:-

¶19

“…..for a direction to the Learned Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur (Respondent No. 2) to dispose of Revision No. 88 PDS of 202223 filed on 13.05.2022 at an early date because in terms of Rule 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted PDS Control Order, 2016 the revision was required to the disposed of within 60 days from the date of its filing.”

¶20

The only prayer sought for in the present writ

¶21

petition is for disposal of the revision filed by the petitioner as

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.14926 of 2022(2) dt.11-12-2024 2/2

¶23

expeditiously as possible.

¶24

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has stated that he has no objection if a direction is given to the authority concerned for disposing of the revision filed by the petitioner by fixing a time frame if not already disposed of.

¶25

Having regard to the above, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur (Respondent No. 2) to dispose of the revision filed by the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of the receipt of the copy of this order. It is needless to observe that before passing any order the petitioner shall be put on notice and given an opportunity of hearing. Any order passed shall be communicated to the parties. In case, the revision is already disposed of, the authority shall communicate the order to the parties.

¶26

With the above observation, the present Writ Petition stands disposed of to the extent indicated.

¶27

(A. Abhishek Reddy, J)

¶28

shakir/- U

Surendra Giri v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Giri v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yaqeub Kuraishi @ Yakub Kuraishi Vs The State of Bihar

Shailendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

M/S Bajrang Enterprises Vs The State of Bihar

Kanti Kunwar Vs The State of Bihar

Bindeshwari Tanti Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Badrul Hussain Vs The State of Bihar