Disposed

Manoj Kumar v. The Punjab National Bank

Patna HC24 Apr 2024CWJC/11351/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition challenging a bank's district-wise merit list for sweeper recruitment, alleging breach of para 20.6 of the Bipartite Settlement regarding preference for past service. The petitioner withdrew to approach the authorities; liberty granted and petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to approach the respondent-authorities for redressal of grievances; writ petition disposed of.

Manoj Kumar Vs The Punjab National Bank — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11351 of 2021

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Manoj Kumar son of Vibhishan Ram resident of Village- Sursand, P.S. Sursand, District- Sitamarhi.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Punjab National Bank being represented through General Manager, Human Resource Management Department, Head Office, New Delhi.

¶7

The Chief Manager, Human Resource Department, Inter- Zonal Office, Patna, Bihar.

¶8

The Circle Head, Human Resource Division, Circle Office, Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

¶9

The Deputy Circle Head, Punjab National Bank, Human Resource Department, Circle Office, Aghoria Bazar, Muzaffarpur, Bihar.

¶10

The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank, Sursand, Sitamarhi, Bihar.

¶11

... ... Respondent/s

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashhar Mustafa, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kumar Priya Ranjan, Adv. Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Adv. Mr.Ram Ganesh, Adv. ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER

¶15

3 24-04-2024 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):-

¶16

“ 1. That the petitioner through the present application has invoked the writ jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate writ(s), order(s), direction(s) for grant of the following reliefs:-

¶17

i. For issuance of writ of Certiorari to set aside the Final District wise Merit List published by the Circle office, Muzaffarpur dated 11.04.2018 as against the advertisement dated 30.08.2017 for

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.11351 of 2021(3) dt.24-04-2024 2/2

¶19

recruitment of Permanent Part Time/ Full Time Sweeper, as being in teeth of para 20.6 of chapter XX of Bipartite Settlement on account of rejection of candidature of the petitioner without giving him any preference for his past service.

¶20

ii. For issuance of writ of mandamus to direct the respondent bank to include the name of the petitioner in the select list by publishing a revised merit list in strict adherence of the mandated contained in para 20.6 of chapter XX of Bipartite settlement.

¶21

iii. For issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondent authorities not to give effect to the final merit list published on 11.04.2018 at least to the extent it is in breach of para 20.6 of chapter XX of Bipartite settlement. ”

¶22

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner

¶23

seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent-authorities for redressal of his aforesaid grievances. Liberty so sought is granted.

¶24

The writ petition stands disposed off.

¶25

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)

¶26

sonal/-

¶27

Manoj Kumar v. The Punjab National Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Kumar v. The Punjab National Bank

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumar Ajit Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Aarti Kumari @ Aarti Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Baccha Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pukar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Savitree Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Dilip Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar