Disposed

Janardan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC30 Jul 2024CWJC/11266/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, an Account Clerk in the Water Resources Department, sought revision of pay scale benefits granted under the Bihar ACP Scheme Rules 2003. Following a co-ordinate bench's approach, the court directed him to file a detailed representation with respondent no. 04, to be decided within 30 days per Amresh Kumar Sinha and Kamlanand Thakur decisions.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file detailed representation with respondent no. 04 within three weeks; authority to dispose it within 30 days per cited precedents.

Janardan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11266 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Janardan Kumar S/o Late Haribansh Sharma, Resident of Mohalla - Quisher Mahal, Chakvinda Road No.- 10, P.O. - Gardanibagh, P.S.- Anisabad, District - Patna, Bihar- 800002.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Secretary (Expenditure) Finance Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Additional Chief Secretary cum Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶10

The Chief Engineer Irrigation Creation Water Resources Department, Aurangabad.

¶11

The Executive Engineer, Sone Canal Division, Khagaul, Patna.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Akash Chaturvedi, AC to SC 11 ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 30-07-2024

¶16

The petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondent authority for grant of benefit of Bihar State Service Conditions (Assured Career Progression) Scheme Rules, 2003, to the petitioner in Pay Scale of Rs. 6,500-10500 to Rs. 10000-15200 with effect from 09^th August 1999, when the petitioner had completed 12 years and 24 years of continuous service respectively and he was granted 1^st and 2^nd ACP as well as 3^rd MACP with Pay Band- 3 Grade Pay 7600 with effect from 01^st January 2009

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.11266 of 2024(2) dt.30-07-2024 2/3

¶18

after completion of 30 years of continuous service when he was granted MACP after being appointed as Account Clerk in the Water Resources Department, in view of the amended provision of 2003 Rules of Bihar State Employees Service Condition (Assured Career Progression Scheme) (Amendment) Rules 2007.Though, the petitioner was granted 1^st and 2^nd ACP, it was the grievance of the petitioner that his Pay Scale was not revised. Had it been revised, in terms of the ACP, he could have received higher salary than the present one. In a similar circumstanced case, a Co-ordinate Bench disposed of a writ petition being CWJC No. 10528 of 2024 (Lallu Prasad & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) dated 15^th July 2024, directing the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the concerned authority and the concerned authority was directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner in the light of the law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Amresh Kumar Sinha & Ors. v. The State of Bihar & Ors. (SLP (C) Nos. 8219-8226 of 2016) as well as by the Full Bench decision of this Court in case of Kamlanand Thakur vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (CWJC No. 18727 of 2017) .

¶19

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that a similar direction may be passed in the instant

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.11266 of 2024(2) dt.30-07-2024 3/3

¶21

writ petition.

¶22

Learned Advocate for the State respondents submits that when the petitioner prays for consideration of his representation, it is not necessary to file counter-affidavit in the instant case.

¶23

Under such facts and circumstances, narrated above, the instant writ petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the respondent no. 04 within three weeks from the date of this order and the respondent no. 04 shall dispose of the said representation in the light of the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Amresh Kumar Sinha (supra) and the Full Bench decision of this Court in Kamlanand Thakur (supra) within 30 days thereafter.

¶24

The instant writ petition is thus, disposed of.

¶25

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

¶26

Suraj Dubey/-

¶27

Janardan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Janardan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lusi Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Ramaswami Bharat Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Moinuddin Vs The State of Bihar

Bijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Nath Tiwari Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.