Disposed

Shakti Swarup v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Jul 2024CWJC/10927/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The single-judge Bench of this High Court heard arguments and disposed of the writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach respondent authorities for redressal of his grievance, directing him to file a representation within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to approach respondent authorities for redressal; petitioner directed to file representation within four weeks.

Shakti Swarup Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10927 of 2024

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Shakti Swarup S/o Sri Akhileshwar Prasad Singh, R/o- Village- Bharwari, P.S.- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

¶4

Versus

¶5

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶6

The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The Bihar Public Service Commission, through its Secretary,15, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Baily Road, Patna.

¶10

The Chairman, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bihar, Patna.

¶11

The Joint Secretary-cum-Examination Controller, Bihar Public Service Commission, Bihar, Patna.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Behari Sinha, Government Advocate-8 Mr. Upendra Kumar Singh, AC to GA-8 For the B.P.S.C. : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 23-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶15

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to approach the respondent authorities for redressal of his grievance. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

¶16

In such view of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna (respondent no.3) within four weeks and the respondent no.3 is directed to consider the case of

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.10927 of 2024(2) dt.23-07-2024 2/2

¶18

the petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter after affording proper opportunity of hearing to him.

¶19

It is made clear that this Court may take action if this order is not complied within the stipulated period as aforesaid.

¶20

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶21

Trivedi/-

¶22

Shakti Swarup v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shakti Swarup v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Gyanu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vipul Bhargav Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Shekhar Vs Bhim Rao Ambedkar Bihar University

Sumant Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Arvind Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate