A civil writ jurisdiction case dismissed as default on account of non-prosecution; no petitioner representative appeared on the date of hearing or on a prior occasion. The order decides nothing of general application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3393 of 2020
======================================================
Vipul Bhargav Son of Din Dayal Chaubey Resident of Mohalla- Sheoganj, Police Station- Sikarpur, District- West Champaran (Bettiah).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Smt. Binita Singh, S.C.-28 For Respondent no.7 : Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Manauri Alam, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
4 22-07-2024
Despite repeated calls, nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner today to argue the matter. Also on 15.07.2024, nobody appeared on his behalf.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
divyanshi/- U
Vipul Bhargav
The State of Bihar through its the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, West Champaran (Bettiah)
The District Programme Officer, (Establishment), West Champaran (Bettiah)
The Block Education Officer, Narkatiyaganj, West Champaran (Bettiah)
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
