Dinesh Chandra Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anjan Singh, Adv. For the Resp-State : Mr. S. D. Yadav, AAG-9 Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, AC to AAG-9 For MMC : Ms. Meeta Sinha, Adv. ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

6 11-01-2024

¶14

Heard Mr. Anjan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, learned counsel for the State and Ms. Meeta Sinha, learned counsel for the Munger Municipal Corporation.

¶15

The petitioner, who superannuated on 31.12.2018 from the post of Tax Collector-cum-Superintendent of Kashturba Water Works, Munger, has filed the present writ petition for the following relief(s):-

¶16

“(i) Payment of family pension from the date of retirement.

¶17

(ii) Contributory amount deducted from payment of provident fund with interest.

¶18

Patna High Court CWJC No.10807 of 2023(6) dt.11-01-2024 2/3

¶19

(iii) Different of pay from 1990 to 1995 as per forth pay revision.

¶20

(iv) Difference of pay from April 1997 to March 2007 as per fifth pay revision.

¶21

(v) Difference of pay from January 2008 to March 2017 as per sixth pay revision.

¶22

(vi) Difference of pay from April 2017 to till the date of retirement i.e. 31.12.2018 as per seventh pay revision.

¶23

(vii) Any other admitted dues for which the petitioner is legally entitled.”

¶24

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that despite having been superannuated in the year 2018, the payment of only gratuity and unutilized earned leave have been made to him. However, till date the other admissible dues as prayed in para-1 of the writ petition has not been accorded, compelling the petitioner to approach before this Court.

¶25

A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Munger Municipal Corporation, wherein the respondent after admitting certain dues amount, denied others.

¶26

Considering the averments made in the counter affidavit, this Court deems it appropriate to accord liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate representation before the respondent no.4, the Municipal Commissioner, Munger Municipal Corporation, Munger, preferably within a period of

¶27

Patna High Court CWJC No.10807 of 2023(6) dt.11-01-2024 3/3

¶28

four weeks from today.

¶29

If such a representation is filed, the same shall be considered and disposed of by a reasoned and speaking order, preferably within a further period of eight weeks. Needless to observe any due amount found payable to the petitioner must also be paid to him, within the period stipulated.

¶30

Any defiance of the order of this Court shall be dealt with sternly.

¶31

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶32

rohit/-

¶33

U

Dinesh Chandra Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Chandra Sharma v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Krishan Kumar @ Kishan Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Firoz @ Md. Firoj Vs the State of Bihar

Sheela Kumari, Vs The State of Bihar

Birendra Kumar Sinha Vs Zila Parishad, Patna

Rampati Devi Vs The Bihar State Road Transport Corporation