Allowed

Krishan Kumar @ Kishan Kumar Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Jan 2024CR. MISC./81594/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court at Patna allowed pre-arrest bail to three petitioners accused of offences under various sections of IPC. Granted pending production of fair antecedent copy in case diary and no foul on pet. ordered bail bonds Rs.10,000 each.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail pending production of fair antecedent copy in case diary and no foul on pet. ordered bail bonds Rs.10,000 each with two sureties on satisfaction of learned CJM Class I subject to condi

Krishan Kumar @ Kishan Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81594 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-97 Year-2023 Thana- KALYANPUR District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Krishan Kumar @ Kishan Kumar Choudhary Son Of Hari Sankar Choudhary @ Harishankar Choudhari Resident Of Village- Tira Jatmalpur, Police Station- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur.

¶5

Mishan Kumar Choudhary Son Of Hari Sankar Choudhary @ Harishankar Choudhari Resident Of Village- Tira Jatmalpur, Police Station- Kalyanpur, District- Samastipur.

¶6

Indu Devi Wife Of Hari Sankar Choudhary @ Harishankar Choudhari Resident Of Village- Tira Jatmalpur, Police Station- Kalyanpur, DistrictSamastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahendra Pratap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jai Narain Thakur, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 10-01-2024 Heard Mr. Mahendra Pratap, learned counsel

¶13

appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 338, 307, 427, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

It is alleged that on being annoyed by the intervention made by the informant while the accused persons were beating their neighbor, Chunnu Chaudhary, just after two

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81594 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 2/3

¶17

days, when the son of the informant was coming to his house, all the three petitioners alongwith father of petitioner no. 1 and 2 intercepted and brutally assaulted and snatched Rs. 40,000/-. On halla, when the informant rushed to the place of occurrence, the petitioner no. 1 and 2 assaulted him by means of iron rod and petitioner no. 3 also assaulted indecently.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submit that from the narratives made in the F.I.R., it is evident that the alleged occurrence took place on 11.03.2023, however, the present F.I.R. has been instituted on 23.03.2023 after a delay of 12 days and no plausible explanation has been given. He further submits that the learned Court below while negating the prayer for bail of the petitioners, though taken note of some of the paragraphs of the case diary, however, there is no discussion with regard to the injuries sustained to the informant and his sons. Further submission has been made that both the parties are next door neighbor and in fact the present F.I.R. has been instituted only in order to wreck vengeance on account of a trifle. That apart, the petitioners are persons of clean antecedent.

¶19

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the pre-arrest bail application and submits that specific allegation has been leveled against the petitioners no. 1 and 2

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.81594 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 3/3

¶21

who assaulted the informant by means of iron rod.

¶22

Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the delay in lodging of the F.I.R. coupled with the fair antecedent of the petitioners and the fact that there is no discussion of the injury in the impugned order, let the petitioners above named be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief judicial Magistrate 1^st Class in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 97 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. with the further condition that one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners.

¶23

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶24

supratim/-

¶25

U T

Krishan Kumar @ Kishan Kumar Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishan Kumar @ Kishan Kumar Choudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ram Jatan Prasad Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar

Ashok Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Awadh Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Firoz @ Md. Firoj Vs the State of Bihar

Nirala Kumar Ray@ Sintu Kumar Yadav @ Santu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar