Disposed

Chandan Kumar v. the State of Bihar Throuth the Principal Secretary, Home Dept., Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Patna HC20 Mar 2024CR. WJC/254/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition seeking release of a child involved in POCSO proceedings from a state remand home was disposed of. The court directed respondents to comply with a previous order and reserved liberty for the petitioner to approach the appropriate remedy for release.

What did the court decide?

Disposed with liberty to approach appropriate remedy for release; Respondent No.3 directed to comply with previous order within two weeks.

Chandan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar Throuth the… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.254 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2023 Thana- NAWADA MUFFASIL District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandan Kumar, Son of Ramashray Chauhan @ Niteshwar Kumar, Resident of Village - Motnaje, P.S. - Nawada Muffasil, District – Nawada.

¶5

... ... Petitioner.

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The District Magistrate, Nawada.

¶9

The Superintendent of Police, Nawada.

¶10

The Superintendent, Government Remand Home Gaighat, Patna.

¶11

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Nawada.

¶12

The Assistant Sub-Inspector of Nawada Muffasil, Nawada.

¶13

Upendra Prasad Son of Late Kameshwar Prasad, Resident of Village - Bharausa, P.S. - Nawada Muffasil, District – Nawada.

¶14

... ... Respondents.

¶15

======================================================

¶16

Appearance :

¶17

For the Petitioner For the State

¶18

: Mr. Krishna Deo Raj, Advocate. : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, AC to AG

¶19

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI)

¶20

Date : 20-03-2024

¶21

In the instant writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):

¶22

“(i) For the issuance of writ application of Habeas Corpus, commanding to the respondent Authorities to release the wife (Sneha Kumari) of petitioner and handed over to the petitioner from after care home/Remand Home, Gaighat, Patna.

¶23

(ii) For issuance of any other relief or reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled.”

¶24

2. Learned counsel for the respondents-State, on

¶25

Patna High Court CR. WJC No.254 of 2024 dt.20-03-2024 2/2

¶26

instructions, submitted that corpus was recovered on 30^th August 2023. The date of birth of the corpus being 13.11.2007 was subjected to recording of her statement under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on 01.09.2023. Thereafter, corpus has been sent to Bal Kalyan Samiti, Nawada. Thereafter, charge-sheet was filed on 30^th December, 2023 for the offences under Sections 4/6 of the POCSO Act and Sections 366/366A/376/376(3) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶27

3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to resort appropriate remedy for the purpose of release from the custody of Bal Kalyan Samiti, Nawada.

¶28

4. Respondent No.3 is hereby directed to comply the previous order dated 13.03.2024 within two weeks.

¶29

5. Re-list this matter on 03.04.2024.

¶30

(P. B. Bajanthri, J)

¶31

( Alok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶32

P.S./-

¶33

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
Uploading Date	22.03.2024.
Transmission Date	22.03.2024.

Chandan Kumar v. the State of Bihar Throuth the Principal Secretary, Home Dept., Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar v. the State of Bihar Throuth the Principal Secretary, Home Dept., Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rupam Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Jagdish Ram and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Education, Govt. Of Bihar, Patn

Sikander Mandal Vs The Employees State Insurance Corporation

Shahnaz Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Registration Excise and Prohibition Department

The State of Bihar Vs Most. Manjoo Kuer

Mukesh Prasad Vs The Union of India