The petitioner-complainant sought reconsideration of the magistrate's decision not to issue process against one accused. The High Court directed the magistrate to reconsider the case under Section 200 CrPC and issue process under Section 204 if sufficient grounds were found.
Direction issued to magistrate to reconsider and potentially issue process.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.701 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2018 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai
======================================================
DHANESHWAR MOCHI Son of Jageshwar Mochi Resident of Village - Nowkothi, P.S.- Nowkothi, District - Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER
4 16-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.701 of 2019(4) dt.16-01-2024 2/2
was issued against him.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
mdrashid/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether sufficient grounds exist to issue process against the complainant regarding the non-empanelment of accused Rohit Kumar.
5 provisions across 4 enactments
DHANESHWAR MOCHI
THE STATE OF BIHAR
Rohit Kumar
BIBEK CHAUDHURI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
