The High Court condoned a delay in filing a criminal revision application challenging an ex-parte maintenance order under Section 125 CrPC. The Court dismissed the revision, holding that the petitioner failed to appear despite notice and that the Family Court's findings on relationship and maintenance quantum were supported by unrebutted evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL REVISION No.1046 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Bhojpur
======================================================
RANJEET KUMAR Son of Ramchandra Sah Resident of Village - Koelwar, P.S.- Koelwar, District - Bhojpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar Mishra, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER
5 06-08-2024 Interlocutory Application No. 01 of 2024
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
delay in filing this Revision Application which is barred by ten months and 28 days.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1046 of 2019(5) dt.06-08-2024 2/3
the petitioner being aggrieved with the order dated 14.06.2018 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhojpur, Ara in Maintenance Case No. 04/2017 whereby and whereunder the Family Court while allowing the application filed under Section 125 by O.P. No. 1, directed the petitioner to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs. 7,000/- to O.P. No. 1-wife and Rs. 5,000/- to O.P. No. 2-daughter.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.1046 of 2019(5) dt.06-08-2024 3/3
acceptable.
(Arvind Singh Chandel , J)
annpurna/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court passed the ex-parte order without affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner?
Whether the findings regarding the relationship between the parties and the quantum of maintenance are perverse or unsupported by evidence?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranjeet Kumar
Sanju Devi
Ritu Kumari
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
