Allowed¶20

Ganesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC20 Feb 2024CR. MISC./8941/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; illicit liquor / Nepali country-made liquor recovery case, Madhubani (Basopatti PS Case No. 266/2023); Sections 272, 273/34 IPC; Section 30(a) Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016; alleged non-compliance of Section 100 CrPC; petitioner in custody since 28-11-2023; clean antecedents; bail bonds Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; CR. MISC. No.8941 of 2024; Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra; dated 20-02-2024.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 266 of 2023. ¶20

Ganesh Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8941 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2023 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ganesh Kumar Yadav S/o Ram Narayan Yadav R/o Vill - Manmohan, P.S. - Basopatti, Dist. - Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ratnakar Jha, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 20-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 266 of 2023 instituted for the offence under Sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

3. As per prosecution case, there is recovery of total 270 liters of illicit Nepali country made liquor from three motorcyles.

¶14

4. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 28-11-2023. Petitioner is stated to be man of clean antecedent.

¶15

5. It has been further submitted by the petitioner’s

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8941 of 2024(2) dt.20-02-2024 2/2

¶17

counsel that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovered liquor. Petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle in question. There is no compliance of Section 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

¶18

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶19

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody of the petitioner, clean antecedent of the petitioner and manner of implication, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

8. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Basopatti P.S. Case No. 266 of 2023.

¶21

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶22

Raj Kishore/- U T

Ganesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhiraj @ Abhiraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ritik Raushan Vs the State of Bihar

Mukesh Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Nandani Devi Vs The State of Bihar