Allowed¶21

Ritik Raushan v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Feb 2024CR. MISC./9054/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail granted; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act S. 30(a); Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 829 of 2023; recovery of 60 litres country-made liquor from bag on motorcycle; petitioner neither owner nor driver of vehicle; alleged non-compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.; custody since 25.11.2023; no criminal antecedent; bail bonds Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; Patna High Court; Coram Rudra Prakash Mishra, J; order dated 19-02-2024.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 829 of 2023. ¶21

Ritik Raushan Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9054 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-829 Year-2023 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ritik Raushan S/O- Late Vinod Prasad R/O- Village/Mohalla- Daulatpur, P.S.Bihta, Dist.- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Diwakar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anish Chandra, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 19-02-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 829 of 2023 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 60 litres of country-made liquor was recovered from the bag kept on motorcycle.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9054 of 2024(2) dt.19-02-2024 2/2

¶18

that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. The petitioner is in custody since 25.11.2023 and has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C.

¶19

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, no criminal antecedent and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 829 of 2023.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Alok Verma/-

¶24

U T

Ritik Raushan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritik Raushan v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Arshad @ Md. Arsad @ Saddab @ Arshad D @ Md. Arasad @ Shadab @ Sadab @ Arasad Vs the State of Bihar

Om Prakash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Darogi Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Abhiraj @ Abhiraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Prasad Vs The State of Bihar