Allowed¶19

Ghanshyam Barkare v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Feb 2024CR. MISC./8865/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8865 of 2024, decided 22-02-2024 by Sandeep Kumar, J.; NDPS Act Sections 8, 17(c), 18(c); arising out of Gaighat P.S. Case No. 377 of 2023, District Muzaffarpur; recovery of 29.650 kilograms Posta Husk and 34 grams opium; petitioner pleaded he was merely driver of the vehicle; in jail since 24.09.2023; bail allowed considering recovery of 'intermittent quantity'; bail bond Rs. 10,000/- with two like sureties before Additional Sessions Judge-11, Muzaffarpur; advocate for petitioner Yugal Kishore; APP Yogendra Kumar.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 11, Muzaffarpur in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 377 of 2023. ¶19

Ghanshyam Barkare Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8865 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2023 Thana- GAIGHAT District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ghanshyam Barkare Son of Ghunnu Lal Barkare R/o vill - Dhmapur @ Dampuri, Gali No. 2, P.s. - Dhampur @ Dampuri, distt - Jabalbur, M.P

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Yugal Kishore For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 22-02-2024

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶10

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 377 of 2023 registered for the offence under Section 8, 17(c) and 18(c) of the NDPS Act.

¶11

As per the prosecution case, 29.650 kilograms of Posta Husk and 34 grams of opium has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

¶12

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is merely the driver of the vehicle.

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8865 of 2024(2) dt.22-02-2024 2/2

¶14

It is also submitted by the learned counsel for

¶15

the petitioner that the petitioner is in jail since 24.09.2023.

¶16

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed

¶17

the prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail.

¶18

Considering the recovery of intermittent quantity, this application is allowed.

¶19

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 11, Muzaffarpur in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 377 of 2023.

¶20

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶21

Vikas/-

¶22

U T

Ghanshyam Barkare v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ghanshyam Barkare v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Prakash Mandal, Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar @ Rajesh Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Nasim Ahmad Vs The State of Bihar

Shashi Ranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhu Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Gaurav Kumar @ Gaurav Kumar Ray Vs the State of Bihar