Allowed¶21

Santosh paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jan 2024CR. MISC./86504/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Cr. Misc. No.86504 of 2023, decided 19-01-2024 by Rudra Prakash Mishra, J. Bail granted to Santosh Paswan (custody since 13.06.2023) in Kumarkhand P.S. Case No. 166 of 2022, Madhepura, for offences under Sections 366A IPC and Section 8 POCSO Act. Charge-sheet filed; no specific overt act alleged; clean antecedent. Grant keyed to parity with co-accused Suman Kumar's bail (Cr. Misc. No. 68906 of 2023, order dt. 20.12.2023) and custody period, over APP opposition. Condition: bail bonds Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kumarkhand P.S. case No. 166 of 2022. ¶21

Santosh paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86504 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2022 Thana- KUMAR KHAND District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANTOSH PASWAN son of late medhar paswan resident of villagebhairopur, ward no. 2, Ps- Kumarkhand, Dist- Madhepura

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surya Narayan Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 19-01-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kumarkhand P.S. case No. 166 of 2022 instituted for the offences under Sections 366A of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act.

¶15

Prosecution case, in short, is that the informant states that she saw accused persons including the petitioner herein, roaming in front of her house and asked them to leave. Subsequently, her 14 year old daughter was found missing from the house. The informant states that she is convinced that the accused persons have kidnapped her minor daughter.

¶16

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2023 and has clean

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86504 of 2023(2) dt.19-01-2024 2/2

¶18

criminal antecedent. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no specific overt act alleged against the petitioner. He further submits that, on similar footing, the co-accused person has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 20.12.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 68906 of 2023.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and specially the grant of bail to the co-accused person, namely, Suman Kumar, vide order dated 20.12.2023 passed by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court, as well as the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kumarkhand P.S. case No. 166 of 2022.

¶22

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶23

Alok Verma/- U T

Santosh paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar @ Manish Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Sada Vs The State of Bihar

Dhananjay Kumar @ Gehuman Vs The State of Bihar

Mukhtar Ansari Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Faijan Mustafa @ Abid @ Md. Faizan Mustafa Vs the State of Bihar

Pappu Yadav @ Pappu Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar