Regular bail sought in a cheating and forgery case alleging appointment as Panchayat Teacher on a forged T.E.T. mark-sheet. Bail granted, but only after framing of charge, on bonds of Rs.30,000 with two sureties and conditions under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. including attendance at the police station.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84623 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-172 Year-2023 Thana- ANDHRAMATH District- Madhubani
======================================================
Krishna Kumar Mahra, S/o Muneshwar Mahra R/o village-Sanpatha, P.SAndhramath, District- Madhubani
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shivnandan Bharti, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nitya Nand Tiwary, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
2 10-01-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84623 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 2/3
that charge-sheet has already been submitted in this case. He also submits that the offences under which FIR has been lodged are magisterial triable.
(i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his bona fide;
(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84623 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 3/3
bonds by the Trial Court itself;
(iii) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned
police station every month for one year to mark attendance;
(iv) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; and
(v) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Divyansh/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a person in custody since 19.10.2023 for alleged employment as Panchayat Teacher on a forged T.E.T. mark-sheet deserves regular bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Krishna Kumar Mahra
The State of Bihar
Dr. Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
