Petitioner, arrested during pendency of his bail application, sought permission to withdraw the application. The application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.81942 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-377 Year-2022 Thana- BIBHUTIPUR District- Samastipur
======================================================
Nirala Kumar Ray@ Sintu Kumar Yadav @ Santu Kumar Son of Ram Sagar Ray, Resident of Village- Belsandi Dih, PS- Bibhitipur, Distt- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER
At the outset, Mr. Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for
the petitioner submits at the bar that during the pendency of the present application, the petitioner got arrested and as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the present application.
(Harish Kumar, J)
Shahnawaz/-
U T
Nirala Kumar Ray @ Sintu Kumar Yadav @ Santu Kumar
The State of Bihar
Harish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
