Dismissed¶23

Sudhir Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC24 Jan 2024CR. MISC./80810/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court; Cr. Misc./CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 80810 of 2023; decision dt. 24-01-2024; Judge Rajesh Kumar Verma; Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar; Kotwali P.S. Case No. 532 of 2023, F.I.R. 18.07.2023; Sections 365/366 IPC; anticipatory bail refused; petitioner not named in FIR, name transpired during investigation; victim not recovered; pending before CJM Patna.

What did the court decide?

Because there is direct allegation against the petitioner, the Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to him in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 532 of 2023 pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna. ¶22

Sudhir Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80810 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-532 Year-2023 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUDHIR KUMAR Son of Sikandra Prasad @ Sikandar Ray R/o Police Chouki Sultanpur, P.S. - Danapur, Distt. - Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 24-01-2024

¶14

Heard Mr. Ghanshyam Tiwary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 532 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 18.07.2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 365/366 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The prosecution case, in brief, is that the wife of the informant had gone to Maurya Lok. Thereafter, she disappeared from there and the F.I.R. was lodged against unknown.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case and in fact the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. and the name of the petitioner has been

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80810 of 2023(2) dt.24-01-2024 2/2

¶19

transpired during investigation and during investigation some of the photographs collected by the Investigation Officer which suggests that the petitioner has relation with the victim and the victim has not yet recovered.

¶20

Learned APP for the State, on the other hand, has

¶21

opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts that there is direct allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 532 of 2023 pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna.

¶23

Prayer is refused.

¶24

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶25

Ibrar//-

¶26

Sudhir Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudhir Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhag Narayan Jha Vs the State of Bihar and Ors.

Ramji Sah Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramesh Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raja Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dhananjay Singh @ Pappu Singh @ Dhananjay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Happy Kumar @ Mayank Gautam Vs the State of Bihar