A writ application was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear on consecutive dates, despite the presence of learned counsel for the State.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13468 of 2012
======================================================
Bhag Narayan Jha
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar And Ors
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Kaushlendra, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kaushal Kr. Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
appeared for the petitioner. Today also when the matter was called no one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State is present.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
ajay/-
U
Bhag Narayan Jha
The State Of Bihar And Ors
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
