Allowed

Prince Kumar @ Chotu Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Jan 2024CR. MISC./80795/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought pre-arrest bail in a Section 414 IPC case where a stolen motorcycle was recovered from co-accused Sunil Kumar, who named the petitioner while in police custody. The court granted anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on pre-arrest bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each before CJM, Aurangabad, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Prince Kumar @ Chotu Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 80795 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2020 Thana- MUFFASIL District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prince Kumar @ Chotu Yadav Son Of Rajendra Yadav Resident Of Village - Mathurapur, P.S.- Kutumba, District- Aurangabad.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State Of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 10-01-2024

¶9

Heard Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, learned counsel

¶10

appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Arun Kumar, learned APP for the State.

¶11

Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Aurangabad Muffasil P.S. Case No.125 of 2020, registered for the offences punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per the allegation made in the FIR, a stolen motorcycle was recovered from the possession of co-accused Sunil Kumar.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that due to enmity co-accused Sunil Kumar, from whose possession the stolen motorcycle is said to be recovered, has named the petitioner while he was in Police custody, which has no evidencery value. From perusal of the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 80795 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 2/2

¶15

F.I.R. no ingredient of Section 414 of I.P.C. is made out against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The case of the petitioner is on similar footing of another co-accused namely Gunjen Kumar, who has been granted pre-arrest bail by this Court, vide order dated 28.07.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No.40226 of 2023.

¶16

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

¶17

Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, stolen motorcycle has been recovered from the possession of co-accused Sunil Kumar, the petitioner is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad/concerned court in connection with Aurangabad Muffasil P.S. Case No.125 of 2020, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Purnendu Singh, J.)

¶19

Ashishsingh/Chn/- U T

Prince Kumar @ Chotu Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prince Kumar @ Chotu Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nandlal Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Champa Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Nitesh Kumar Pandey Vs the State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Putli Devi Vs The State of Bihar