Rajesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Jan 2024CR. MISC./80906/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar, Patna High Court, CR. MISC. No.80906 of 2023, decided 10-01-2024 by Purnendu Singh, J. Pre-arrest bail; Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.; Sections 341, 353, 354(A), 506/34 IPC; Andhrathadi (Andhratharhi) P.S. Case No.41 of 2022; District Madhubani; Jhanjharpur; Aangan Bari Sewika/Kendra; bail bond Rs.10,000 with two sureties; application allowed.

What did the court decide?

Pre-arrest bail granted: petitioner to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within four weeks, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. ¶¶18

Rajesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80906 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2022 Thana- ANDHRATHARHI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rajesh Kumar Son Of Late Santosh Kumar Presently Residing At 24/15, Gali No.12, Samaypur, Railway Road Libaspur, P.S. - Sagarpur, New Delhi, Permanent Resident Of Village - Drmara, P.S. - Rudrapur, District – Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 10-01-2024

¶11

Heard Mr. Jitendra Kumar Bharti, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, learned APP for the State.

¶12

Petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Andhrathadi P.S. Case No.41 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 353, 354(A) and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

As per the allegation made in the FIR, all the accused persons including the petitioner misbehaved with the informant at her office and threatened her of dire consequences.

¶14

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR rather he has been roped in the present case because the wife of

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80906 of 2023(2) dt.10-01-2024 2/2

¶16

the petitioner is an Aangan Bari Sewika and the petitioner was not present at the time of inspection of Aangan Bari Kendra.

¶17

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Having considered the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, considering the nature of allegation made in the FIR, the petitioner is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Smt. Rinki Kumar, learned Judicial Magistrate-Ist Class, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani/concerned court in connection with Andhrathadi P.S. Case No.41 of 2022, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶19

(Purnendu Singh, J.)

¶20

Ashishsingh/Chn/-

¶21

Rajesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nandlal Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Champa Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Nitesh Kumar Pandey Vs the State of Bihar

Putli Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Munnilal Yadav Vs the State of Bihar