Allowed

Rajnish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Sept 2024CR. MISC./8010/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Husband sought anticipatory bail in a complaint case under Sections 498A and 406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The court granted anticipatory bail on furnishing bonds, conditioned on payment of Rs. 2500 monthly maintenance to the complainant wife.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on bail bond of Rs. 5,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions and payment of Rs. 2,500 monthly maintenance.

Rajnish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Maintenance and Alimony | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8010 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-909 Year-2019 Thana- BEGUSARAI COMPLAINT CASE District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAJNISH KUMAR Son of Dinesh Paswan R/V- Ward no. 1, Ratgawan Karari P.S- Teghra Dist- Begusarai

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Rohini Kumari @ Puja Wife of Rajnish Kumar R/V- Ward no. 1, Ratgawn Karari, Distt- Begusarai at present D/o Ganesh Paswan, R/V- Sagi, P.SKhodawanandpur, Distt- Begusarai

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance :

¶11

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Randhir Kumar No.1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit

¶12

======================================================

¶13

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶14

4 02-09-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶16

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶17

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶18

No one appears on behalf of the O.P. No. 2.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier when the case was taken up on 28.08.2024, on that date also no one had appeared on behalf of the O.P. No. 2 and thereafter the case was directed to be listed on 31.08.2024.

¶20

Today, when the case is taken up, again no one appears on behalf of the O.P. No. 2.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8010 of 2023(4) dt.02-09-2024 2/3

¶22

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner, being husband, has been falsely implicated in the present case by the complainant. It is next submitted that petitioner is still willing to keep the O.P. No. 2 with honour and dignity, but then submits that for reasons best known, the O.P. No. 2 is not willing to stay with the petitioner.

¶23

It is asserted and submitted that petitioner has not performed his second marriage.

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioner next submits that with passage of time and on intervention of well wishers, the parties may resolve the dispute, but then no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner to jail as petitioner is willing to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs. 2500/- to the O.P. No. 2. It is also submitted that petitioner works as a labourer outside the State of Bihar.

¶25

Learned A.P.P. for the State fairly submits that no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner to jail since petitioner is willing to pay a monthly maintenance of Rs. 2500/- to the O.P. No. 2.

¶26

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court

¶27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8010 of 2023(4) dt.02-09-2024 3/3

¶28

within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Complaint Case No. 909c of 2019 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶29

However, it is made clear that the O.P. No. 2 shall be at liberty to file an application before this Court seeking cancellation of the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner in the event if the petitioner does not deposit the amount of monthly maintenance, as agreed, for two consecutive months.

¶30

It is further submitted that the present maintenance will stop, in the event if a Court of competent jurisdiction fixes the maintenance.

¶31

The learned Trial Court is directed to hand over a copy of the instant order to the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the O.P. No. 2.

¶32

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶33

Rishabh/-

¶34

U T

Rajnish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajnish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeet Kumar Jha @ Monu Jha Vs the State of Bihar

Bhunnu Yadav @ Tunu @ Arvind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Ezaz @ Md. Ejaz Ahmed Vs the State of Bihar

Dr. Meenaxi Swaraj @ Minakashi Swaraj Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Rai Vs The State of Bihar