Allowed

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Sept 2024CR. MISC./45326/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail sought in an excise case over alleged recovery of 25 litres of liquor from a public Diyara area, with the FIR allegedly not disclosing grounds for implication. The Court granted anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds with two sureties, subject to CrPC Section 438(2) conditions and trial court verification of antecedents.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on Rs. 500 bond with two sureties of like amount, within six weeks, subject to CrPC s. 438(2) conditions and verification of clean antecedents by the trial court.

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45326 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Rai Son of Daroga Rai Resident of Village-Khaspur, P.O.- Daudpur, P.S.-Maner, District Patna.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bajarangi Lal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 02-09-2024

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶10

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 32(i), 41(i) and 36 of the Bihar Excise Act.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a supplementary affidavit has been filed clarifying the defects pointed out by the office.

¶12

It is submitted that name of the uncle of the petitioner in the FIR was recorded as his father, when father of the petitioner is Daroga Rai. It is further submitted that the deponent of the case who has been shown as father of the petitioner in the FIR, has sworn the affidavit of the anticipatory

¶13

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45326 of 2024(3) dt.02-09-2024 2/3

¶14

bail application as uncle of the petitioner.

¶15

In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the defect as pointed out by the office is ignored.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 25 liters of liquor from a Diyara area.

¶17

It is next submitted that petitioner was not apprehended from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner and is accessible to public at large. It is further submitted that from perusal of the FIR, it would manifest that the same also does not disclose that on what basis the petitioner has been implicated in the instant case, which amply demonstrates that the petitioner, in a mechanical manner, has been implicated when he is a person with clean antecedent.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45326 of 2024(3) dt.02-09-2024 3/3

¶21

within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with PR Maner P.S. Case No. 156 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

However, it is made clear the learned Trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

Rishabh/-

¶25

U T

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vijay Kumar @ Vijay Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeet Kumar Jha @ Monu Jha Vs the State of Bihar

Bhunnu Yadav @ Tunu @ Arvind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Ezaz @ Md. Ejaz Ahmed Vs the State of Bihar

Dr. Meenaxi Swaraj @ Minakashi Swaraj Vs The State of Bihar

Rajnish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar