Mulayam Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 61606 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rudra Deo, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 67527 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rudra Deo, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP (In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 79174 of 2024) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rudra Deo, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Md. Fahimuddin, APP ======================================================

¶29

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA

¶30

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61606 of 2024(3) dt.02-12-2024 2/4

¶31

ORAL ORDER

¶32

3 02-12-2024 Heard Mr. Rudra Deo, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Rabindra Kumar (Cr. Misc. No. 61606 of 2024), Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha (Cr. Misc. No. 67527 of 2024), Md. Fahimuddin (Cr. Misc. No. 79174 of 2024), learned Additional Public Prosecutors for the State.

¶33

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 265 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 14.11.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶34

According to prosecution case, petitioners are said to have committed murder of son of the informant.

¶35

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners, namely, Pintu Bin @ Bisesar Kumar, and Muskan Chauhan have clean antecedents and petitioner, namely, Mulayam Yadav carries three more cases other than the present one but he is on bail in all the pending matters and they have falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR and informant is not the eye witness of the alleged occurrence and even no one has seen the alleged occurrence. He further submits that as per the FIR the petitioners and other co-

¶36

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61606 of 2024(3) dt.02-12-2024 3/4

¶37

accused persons took the son of the informant and thereafter the dead body of the son of the informant was found on the very next date. He further submits that except the suspicion no other cogent material has come during the investigation to suggest the involvement of the petitioners in the present occurrence. He further submits that co-accused person, namely, Amit Yadav @ Amit Kumar Yadav has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 18.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 14744 of 2024 and co-accused person, namely, Pankaj Yadav @ Baba Yadav has also been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 06.09.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56771 of 2024.

¶38

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

¶39

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M., 1^st Class, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur

¶40

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61606 of 2024(3) dt.02-12-2024 4/4

¶41

P.S. Case No. 265 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:-

¶42

i. Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

¶43

ii. If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶44

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

¶45

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)

¶46

ajay/-

¶47

U T

Mulayam Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mulayam Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mani Bhashkar Kumar Yadav @ Mani Bhaskar Yadav @ Mani Bhashkar Kumar @ Samir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Parashuram Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar through Mr. Pratyaya Amrit, the Principal Secretary, Department of Health

Vijay Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar

Anjani Chouhan Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Bajaj Vs The State of Bihar

Muskan Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar