Petition for regular bail under Sections 8/20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act. The court observed the recovery was below commercial quantity, the petitioner had clean antecedents, and the charge-sheet was framed. Bail was granted on furnishing bonds.
Bail granted on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 30,000/- with two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7521 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-169 Year-2023 Thana- DANAPUR RAIL P.S. District- Patna
======================================================
RAVI KANT KUMAR S/O SATYANARAYAN PRASAD R/O VILLAGESULEMANPUR, P.S- RAHUEE (RAHUI), DISTT.- NALANDA.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Tej Kumar Maharaj, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
3 09-04-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7521 of 2024(3) dt.09-04-2024 2/2
upon him.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Prakashmani/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in an NDPS case involving ganja below commercial quantity?
Whether the petitioner has clean antecedents and is ready to fulfill bail conditions?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ravi Kant Kumar
The State of Bihar
Dr. Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
