Petitioner sought withdrawal of a quashing application with liberty to raise issues at charge framing. The court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the application accordingly.
Permission to withdraw the quashing application with liberty to raise issues at the time of framing of charge was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.73754 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2016 Thana- HABIBPUR District- Bhagalpur
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jharkhandi Upadhyay
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
2 . Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing vehemently for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the quashing application with liberty to raise all issues at the time of framing of charge.
3 . Permission is accorded.
4 . Accordingly, the present quashing application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
SUMIT/-
U T
Suman Kumar Suman @ Pintu Yadav
Mausami Rani
The State of Bihar
Diwakar Mishra
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
