Petitioners sought quashing of a complaint case but, after arguing, withdrew the application with liberty to raise all issues at the stage of framing of charge. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with that liberty.
Liberty to raise all issues at the time of framing of charge; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9503 of 2017
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-64 Year-2013 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap Mr. Vijay Kr Singh No. 1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.P.P. for the State.
arguing vehemently for sometimes, seeks permission to withdraw the present quashing application with a liberty to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9503 of 2017(5) dt.16-01-2024 2/2
the petitioners to raise all the issues at the time of framing
of charge, if the charges, till date, have not been framed.
withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
Smita Devi @ Sandhya Devi
Ramashankar Prasad
Girja Devi
Rajeev Kumar
Rajesh Kumar
Ramjee Prasad
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
