Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Feb 2024CR. MISC./7290/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail granted — fatal road accident — negligent and drunken driving — IPC Ss.279, 337, 338, 304(A) — Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act S.37 — Patna HC Crl. Misc. No.7290/2024, order dt. 17-02-2024 — Gogri (Paura) PS Case 342/2023, Khagaria — custody since 21.09.2023 — bail bond Rs.10,000 with two like sureties — Special Judge (Excise)-1st, Khagaria.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on regular bail in connection with Gogri (Paura) P.S. Case No. 342 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge Excise-1st, Khagaria. ¶¶20

Sanjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7290 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-342 Year-2023 Thana- GOGRI District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjay Yadav S/O Pramod Yadav Village- Paura, Ps. Gogri (PAURA O.P.) Dist. Khagaria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raja Surendra Mohan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pranav Kumar ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 17-02-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 279, 337, 338 and 304(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 37 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

Allegation against the petitioner along with other co-accused person is that they caused accident of the informant’s husband by negligent driving in drunken condition due to which the informant’s husband died.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that FIR has been registered under Section 304(A) of the IPC which

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7290 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 2/2

¶18

is bailable in nature. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 21.09.2023.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶20

6.Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Gogri (Paura) P.S. Case No. 342 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise-1st Khagaria.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

Shubham/-

¶23

U T

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lal Babu Mishra Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Usman Sah @ Md. Usman Vs The State of Bihar

Dipak Rai @ Dipu Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Akhtar Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Rambahadur Singh @ Rambahadura Singh @ Rambadur Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Abul Khairuddin Vs The State of Bihar