Allowed

Anil Parsad Jaiswal v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Oct 2024CR. MISC./72323/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail sought under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after alleged recovery of 2.34 litres of foreign made liquor from the petitioner. Considering custody and circumstances, the Patna High Court enlarged him on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, with a condition not to repeat similar offences.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount before Special Judge Excise-1, Kaimur; condition not to indulge in similar offences.

Anil Parsad Jaiswal Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72323 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-687 Year-2024 Thana- BHABHUA District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anil Parsad Jaiswal S/O Yamuna Parsad Jaiswal R/O Village- Nati, P.SSonhan, District- Kaimur, Bihar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

The State Of Bihar

¶9

The State Of Bihar

¶10

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

======================================================

¶12

Appearance :

¶13

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Aquaib Khan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Pd.(App) ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 07-10-2024

¶16

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶17

APP for the State.

¶18

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

¶19

Allegation against the petitioner is that altogether

¶20

2.34 litres of foreign made liquor was recovered from his possession.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72323 of 2024(2) dt.07-10-2024 2/2

¶23

30.08.2024.

¶24

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶25

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bhabhua P.S. Case No. 687 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge Excise-1 Kaimur, Bhabhua.

¶26

The present regular bail application is allowed with a condition that the petitioner shall not indulge in same nature of offences in future.

¶27

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶28

Sudhanshu/-

¶29

U T

Anil Parsad Jaiswal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Parsad Jaiswal v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Niraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nayan Kumar @ Bhavi Shankar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Gupta @ Pankaj Shatrughna Gupta @ Pankaj Vs The State of Bihar

Kallu Paswan @ Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar