Allowed

Pankaj Gupta @ Pankaj Shatrughna Gupta @ Pankaj v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Oct 2024CR. MISC./72167/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court was inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner, who was in judicial custody since May 25, 2024, in a case involving theft under sections 379, 414, and 411 of the IPC. The court ordered his release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties of the like amount.

Pankaj Gupta @ Pankaj Shatrughna Gupta @ Pankaj Vs The State… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72167 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2024 Thana- SAMASTIPUR GRP CASE DistrictSamastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Pankaj Gupta @ Pankaj Shatrughna Gupta @ Pankaj S/o Shatrudhan Prasad Gupta R/o vill - Bhelwa Tola, ward no. 1, P.O. and P.S. - Jaynagar, Distt. - Madhubani, Bihar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhigyan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 07-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 379, 414 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The case of prosecution is that the informant had parked his bike in the premises of railway station and his bike was missing from that place. On enquiry, he came to know that this petitioner was involved in the theft of the bike and the said vehicle was recovered from his possession.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted by

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72167 of 2024(2) dt.07-10-2024 2/2

¶17

learned counsel for the petitioner that charge sheet has been submitted and charge has also been framed in this case. Trial has also started. This case is triable by Judicial Magistrate. A statement has been made in para-3 of this petition that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Moreover, he is languishing in judicial custody since 25.05.2024.

¶18

Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

¶19

6.Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Rail Jaynagar GRP PS FIR No. 15 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway), District- Samastipur.

¶20

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

Shubham/-

¶22

U T

Pankaj Gupta @ Pankaj Shatrughna Gupta @ Pankaj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Gupta @ Pankaj Shatrughna Gupta @ Pankaj v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Niraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nayan Kumar @ Bhavi Shankar Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kallu Paswan @ Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vishal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Parsad Jaiswal Vs The State of Bihar