Allowed¶¶22

Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Bail – Arms Act, Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26

Patna HC2 Dec 2024CR. MISC./71761/2024

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Criminal Miscellaneous No.71761 of 2024, Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar, decided 02-12-2024 by Justice Rudra Prakash Mishra. Bail application under Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act arising from Waini P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024, District Samastipur; recovery of country-made pistol without cartridge; charge-sheet filed; custody since 18.07.2024; no criminal antecedent; plea of non-compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C.; bail allowed with Rs. 10,000/- bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted: petitioner to be released on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Waini P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024. ¶¶22

Ritesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71761 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2024 Thana- VAINI District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ritesh Kumar S/o- Manoj Paswan Resident of village- Khaira P.s- Waini District-Samastipur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mandira Sau, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Shaheen Begum, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 02-12-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned

¶14

APP for the State and perused the case diary.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in Waini P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)(a) and 26 of the Arms Act.

¶16

The prosecution case, in short, is that, there is recovery of one country made pistol without cartridge from the house of the petitioner.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71761 of 2024(3) dt.02-12-2024 2/2

¶19

also submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of arms. It is further submitted that the petitioner is residing in a joint house where other family members also reside. The petitioner is in custody since 18.07.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

¶20

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Waini P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024.

¶23

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶24

Rajorshi/-

Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ritesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Raja Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Suman Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Sher Khan @ Sher Mohammad Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Sharma @ Manish Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shahid Vs The State of Bihar